How long will my corpus actually last?
The withdrawal rate dominates, not the return you assume. Two extra points of withdrawal can halve how long the money lasts, and inflation is usually left out entirely.
Ashish S Kumar4 min read

Accumulation gets all the attention. The harder question arrives on the day the salary stops: you have a number, you need it to produce an income, and you need that income to keep pace with prices for a period whose length you do not know.
Most retirement planning stops at the corpus. The corpus is the input, not the answer.
Three numbers, and one of them dominates
How long a pot lasts depends on what you withdraw, what it earns, and how fast prices rise. People spend most of their effort on the return assumption, which is the one they control least and which matters less than they think.
The withdrawal rate dominates. Taking four per cent of a corpus a year is a very different proposition from taking six, and the difference is not a third — it is frequently the difference between a pot that outlives you and one that runs out in your seventies.
See how long a corpus actually lasts
Runs in your browser — nothing is uploaded. Open the full swp calculator
Inflation is the part that gets left out
A withdrawal that stays flat is a withdrawal that shrinks. At six per cent inflation, money halves in purchasing power in about twelve years — so a fixed ₹60,000 a month at 60 buys roughly what ₹30,000 buys today by the time you are 72.
A realistic plan raises the withdrawal each year to hold the standard of living steady, and that changes the arithmetic considerably. A corpus that lasts thirty years on flat withdrawals may last twenty on rising ones.
| Assumption | What it hides |
|---|---|
| Flat monthly withdrawal | Your income falls in real terms every year |
| Nominal corpus target | ₹2 crore in 2050 is not ₹2 crore today |
| Single average return | Sequence matters — an early bad run does lasting damage |
| Fixed retirement length | The risk is living longer than planned, not shorter |
Sequence risk, and why averages mislead
Two portfolios can earn the same average return over thirty years and produce completely different outcomes, depending on when the bad years arrive. A sharp fall in the first few years of drawdown is far more damaging than the same fall two decades later, because you are selling units at depressed prices to fund withdrawals and those units never recover.
The usual mitigation is holding two or three years of planned withdrawals in something stable, so a bad market can be ridden out without selling into it. It costs a little return and removes the failure mode that does the most damage.
The 4% rule, and why it travels badly
The familiar guideline — withdraw four per cent in year one and raise it with inflation — comes from a specific study of a specific market over a specific period. It is a useful starting point and a poor universal law.
Indian inflation has generally run higher than the environment that rule was derived in, which argues for a lower initial rate rather than a higher one. Treat four per cent as a conversation opener, run your own numbers, and then run them again at a worse return.
- 1Start from the monthly income you need, in today's money.
- 2Inflate it to your retirement date. This is where the number stops feeling comfortable.
- 3Work out the corpus that supports it at a withdrawal rate you can defend.
- 4Test it at a return two or three points lower, and check the plan still holds.
- 5Keep two to three years of withdrawals outside equity.
Getting to the number is the other half of the problem — see SIP or lump sum and, for where the safe portion belongs, where to put your money in India.
Model the corpus and the drawdown togetherBuild a corpus, then see how many years it funds you.Frequently asked questions
- How much do I need to retire?
- Start from the annual income you want in today's money, inflate it to your retirement date, and divide by a withdrawal rate you can defend — often nearer 3.5% than 4% given Indian inflation. The number that falls out is usually larger than expected.
- Is the 4% rule safe in India?
- It was derived from a different market and a different inflation environment, and Indian inflation has generally been higher. Treat 4% as a starting point to test rather than a threshold to rely on.
- Should I move everything to deposits at retirement?
- Usually not. A retirement can last thirty years, and a portfolio entirely in deposits loses purchasing power throughout it. The common approach keeps some equity for the long tail while holding the next few years of withdrawals in something stable.
- What is sequence risk?
- The risk that poor returns arrive early in drawdown. Selling units at depressed prices to fund withdrawals permanently removes them, so the same average return can produce very different outcomes depending on the order the years arrive in.
- Can I just live off the interest?
- Only if the interest exceeds inflation by enough to cover your withdrawals, which deposits rarely do after tax. Most plans need to draw on capital as well, which is exactly why the withdrawal rate matters so much.
Sources
- 1.Securities and Exchange Board of India — SEBI
- 2.Association of Mutual Funds in India — AMFI
- 3.Master Directions — Reserve Bank of India
Tools from this guide
More on savings & tax
- CTC versus in-hand: where the rest of it goesCost to company includes money that never reaches your payslip. Only one of the four gaps is a genuine loss — the rest is deferred, and the structure decides how much.5 min
- Cumulative or non-cumulative: which FD pays moreOne compounds and pays at maturity, the other pays interest out and never compounds. The rate is usually identical; the return is not, and the tax timing catches people out.5 min
- Why a 444-day FD is not the same as 15 monthsBanks pick odd tenures because they are hard to compare. Interest compounds only on completed quarters, and the leftover days earn simple interest. Here is what that costs.5 min